Monday, 26 November 2012

Socialism undermining Christianity?

All of human life, whether individual or collective, shows itself to be a dramatic struggle between good and evil, between light and darkness”.... Pressing upon the Christian are the need and the duty to battle against evil through many tribulations and even to suffer death: .... “For the monumental struggle against the powers of darkness pervades the whole history of man. The battle was joined from the very origins of the world and will continue until the last day, as the Lord has attested. Caught in this conflict man is obliged to wrestle constantly if he is to cling to what is good. Nor can he achieve his own integrity without valiant efforts and the help of God’s grace”.

VATICAN II (L-G. 13,22,37).

“The life of Christians ... is a warfare”. (General Catechetical Directory 57).

First a definition of Socialism. The words Socialist and Socialism came into use in Great Britain and France soon after 1825 and were first applied to the doctrines of certain writers who were seeking a complete transformation of the economic and moral basis of society by the substitution of social for individual control and of social for individualistic forces in the organisation of life and work. (1). In England beginning in 1848 there was a movement for what was called ‘Christian socialism’. It was moved by horror at the appalling conditions in England’s “dark, Satanic mills”. Life was nasty, brutish and short. (Hobbes).

Extreme Socialism: Socialism in Europe was pretty moderate until Karl Marx and Frederick Engels entered the fray. V. Lenin was responsible for implementing their ideas in Russia and largely for the eventual set up of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic. (U.S.S.R.).
With the fall of the U.S.S.R. many believed that socialism was no longer a threat. Many also believed that the New Left of the Sixties also collapsed and disappeared as well. But the progressives on the Left did not give up their desire to overthrow the social, cultural and moral structures of the West. The tactics changed but the goals remained: the abolition of private property, Religion and the present form of marriage.
Proponents of Socialism traded in Revolution for Evolution, for the gradualism of the Fabian socialists who encouraged the use of democratic institutions to achieve socialist goals. Radicals like Lenin and Castro were replaced with the cultural Marxism of Theodore Adorno or Antonio Gramsci who called, in imitation of Chairman Mao’s long march in China, for a ‘long march through the institutions’ of Western culture.

Single Issue Groups: The revolutionaries reorganised themselves into a multitude of single issue groups. So we now have for example, radical feminists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists and ‘gay’ rights groups. All of these groups pursue their little bit of radical agenda through a complex of network organisations like Gay and Lesbian Groups, Planned Parenthood etc. Of course, not all single issue groups are socialistic in origin. Some of these have a decidedly affluent society life style.
Socialism favours code words like tolerance, equality, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, inclusion, diversity and sensitivity. All together, Linda Kimball says this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism. Not to be confused with cultural diversity which is a good thing. (2). As we’ll see later, tolerance is not extended to Christianity!
By the end of World War I socialists realized that things were not going as planned for the world’s proletariat did not heed Marx’s call to rise up against evil capitalism and embrace  communism instead. What had gone wrong?

Christianity an Obstacle: Separately, two Marxist thinkers - Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a Communist New World Order. Gramsci believed in achieving a de-Christianized Europe by means of “a long march through the culture”. Additionally a new proletariat had to be created and he believed it should be composed of criminals, women and racial minorities. (3).     
Gramsci reasoned that the new battleground must be the culture starting with the traditional family. The Russian Communist revolution had introduced sex instruction, abortion and made women go out to work – all contributed to the destruction of family – which is an imperative for them if the Left is to get complete control.

Family Attack: U.S. Senator Rick Santorum is a courageous Prolife Catholic Republican.
Santorum told Pro-Life Christians in America: “there will be an assault on the institution of marriage. Why? Because the Left knows that they can’t really have government come in and take control of everything unless they destroy the family”. (4).
Gramsci held that not only the family but churches, schools, media, entertainment , civic organisations, literature, science and history all must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top. The British award-winning journalist Melanie Phillips has written a new book with this title: The World Turned Upside Down : The Global Battle Over God, Truth and Power (Encounter Books). She says that right has turned into wrong, justice into injustice, victim into victimizer and so on. (5).
The rapid removal of many restraints in Western Society can lead to chaos. The early Fathers of the Church used to speculate on the “Restrainer” holding back the manifestation of the Anti Christ mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:6. I believe that the destruction of Christian culture is the removal of the restrainer.

Cultural Marxism: In 1919 Georg Lukacs was appointed in charge of culture in the short lived Bolshevik regime in Hungary. Immediately he introduced plans to de-Christianize the country. He reasoned that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be hamstrung. So graphic sex education was organised combined with the deriding of Christian moral ethics, monogamy and parental authority. Hungary’s youth fed a diet of atheism and radical sex education and rejection of all authority easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers and sociopaths. (6). Hungary is still reeling from this aggressive sex education and has the biggest porn movie industry in Eastern Europe. Gramsci and Lukacs were the precursors of Cultural Marxism.

Frankfort School: In 1923 the Frankfort School – a Marxist think tank was founded by Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno in an attempt to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms and so infiltrate and destroy Western Christian Values!. “Towards this end, Marcuse who favoured polymorphous perversion expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians and transsexuals. Into this was spliced Lukacs radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added in the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism now known in the West as Multiculturalism”. (7).

Pathologising Enemies: Additional big guns were brought into place: the pathologising of what was going to be destroyed. By courtesy of the Frankfort School, Theodor Adorno’s idea of the “authoritarian personality” was introduced. Adorno’s concept was premised on the notion that (i) Christianity, (ii) Capitalism and (iii) the traditional family easily lead to people prone to racism and fascism. (Incidentally modern Russia where these three things were missing for generations still manages to produce some of the greatest racists and fascists in Europe). The upshot was that anyone who upholds traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist.

Politically Correct: Another diabolically crafted idea was political correctness – that in order not to be thought of as racist or fascist, or God forbid - conservative then one must not only be nonjudgmental but must also embrace the ‘new’ moral absolutes : diversity, choice, sensitivity, sexual orientation, equality and tolerance. Kimball holds that “political correctness is a Machiavellian psychological ‘command and control’ device. Its purpose is the imposition of uniformity in thought, speech and behaviour”. A Labour peer, Lord Donoughue in 2010 expressed shame over the Labour Government’s ‘intolerant bigotry’ towards Christians and attacked ‘politically correct zealots’ (8). The latter want implemented a new morality imposed by the state which is hostile to Christianity especially Catholics. A Labour Member of the European Parliament, which is nearly all Socialist and anti Christian questioned whether Catholics should be allowed in the Cabinet at all. Francis Fukuyama says of Christian Democratic (or Socialist) parties in Europe that they ‘are democratic before they are Christian’ and that Liberalism (or Socialism) has vanquished Religion from Europe”. (9). I believe that this vanquishing in Europe was not an accident but contrived. So the European Union wants no acknowledgement whatsoever of its Christian past in its new Constitution!

Critical Theory: Linda Kimball writes of another psychological ‘command and control’ device : ‘Critical Theory’. She quotes D.J. Flynn : “Critical Theory, as its name implies criticizes. What deconstruction does to literature Critical Theory does to societies”. Critical Theory is an ongoing and brutal assault via vicious criticism relentlessly levelled against Christians, Christmas, the Boy Scouts, The Ten Commandments and other aspects of traditional culture and society. Kimball believes that both political correctness and Critical Theory are in essence psychological bullying – the psycho-political battering rams by which the Frankfort school disciples force people to submit and obey the will and the way of the Left.
This includes the negative criticism of Catholic groups like Opus Dei – The founder Escrivá was targeted for assassination by the Republican socialists in Spain. Thousands of priests and nuns were butchered in the socialist hatred, corpses of nuns disinterred and subjected to vile rites. Pope Pius XI denounced ‘the Satanic enterprise’. Now, the vile ‘La Pasionaria’ is the hero and Escrivá the villain. (10). A victim of Critical Theory? ‘Right has turned into wrong and the vilifiers of Escrivá and other great saintly figures are vilified even in our own Church ranks so successful has the disinformation been. Even orthodoxy is pilloried as being Right Wing. (Read: Evil).
Ed Koch, the former mayor of New York and a Jew wrote: “I believe the continuing attacks by the media on the Roman Catholic Church and Pope Benedict XVI have become manifestations of anti-Catholicism. The procession of articles on the same events are, in my opinion, no longer intended to inform but simply to castigate. Many of those in the media who are pounding on the Church and the Pope today clearly do it with delight and some with malice”. (11). I believe that the media’s greatest weapon in demolishing traditional values is via the highly addictive evening soap operas on T.V. These act as change agents and smuggle alien ideas past the internal censor when people are tired after a day’s work and resistance is low. Alien ideas like abortion, gay rights, euthanasia etc. are promoted when people are most open and most vulnerable. Fr Benedict Groeschel says that “the media is involved in a huge undermining of Catholic and evangelical Churches.


  
Socialism and South Africa: “Secularism has been installed as the state religion since 1994, according to Cardinal Wilfrid Napier of Durban...Cardinal Napier said that as a nation we had turned away from God and the laws and customs that honoured Him. All traditional human, and especially Christian, values and norms have been steadily and methodically undermined and eroded. The national ethos and particularly the laws and statutes were more those of unbelievers. Indeed, in the case of abortion we have gone even further than the unbelievers have. (12). Socialists in R.S.A. seem to have decided on evolutionary socialism. The long march through R.S.A. institutions has begun. And in Latin America where the new socialist regimes are working tirelessly to hamstring the Church and impose Fabian or Marxist Socialism.
Cardinal Napier has again recently commented on the dramatic changes that have taken place in this socialist state of South Africa. On homosexuality he says: “Ten years ago it was a perversion, then it became a human right and now it is an identity”. (13). It could only be ideology of the Lukacs and Marcuses that perpetuates the gay myths not health concerns. For example surveys show :
1.    that the median age of death for non aids gays is 42 years (45 for lesbians).
2.    that 25% of gay men (and 20% of women) have attempted suicide.
3.    Homosexuality has led to a host of new diseases like ‘gay bowel syndrome’ and increases in typhoid due to unhygienic practices.
4.    although only 1.5% - 2.5% of the U.S. population, gays constitute about a third of child molesters. (13A).
Rightly does Newsweek state that ‘ideology, not sound science, has perpetrated the
1-in-10 myth’. And the ideology is the socialist ideology of Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse and Planned Parenthood. The President of the latter Frederick Joffee proposed in 1969 in an internal memorandum that Planned Parenthood ‘encourage increased homosexuality’ to reduce U.S. fertility!
Our national Catholic family paper the Southern Cross also perpetuates these gay myths with impunity. (cf. Southern Cross 31/07/2002).     

Fabians: On the subject of change Liam Swords says that “all the great moments of change in history for good or ill began with individuals or small groups of like minded people”. (14).
This is particularly true of an initially small group of socialists called the Fabian Society. Though small they have had a profound influence on the world. It was founded in England within a year of the death of Karl Marx in 1883. Its aim was to promote his ideas but by gradualism, by evolution not revolution. They worked for a one-world socialist government on a piecemeal basis rather than a revolution. Some prominent names were Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, John Dewey, Margaret Sanger, Havlock Ellis and Aldous and Julian Huxley etc.  
All of them seem to have been libertarians and had an antipathy towards Christianity. Some of them like George Bernard Shaw and John Dewey travelled to Soviet Russia and praised Bolshevikism, ignoring the millions of deaths in Ukraine, probably agreeing with Lenin that in order to make a good omelette one needs to smash some eggs first!
After returning from the U.S.S.R., Dewey said that “the great task of the school is to counteract and transform those domestic and neighbourhood tendencies... the influence of home and church” (15). Roy Jenkins, Home Affairs Minister in the Harold Wilson Labour Government was a Fabian who famously remarked that “the permissive society is the civilised society”. So Pope Benedict’s complaint that ‘filth has entered the Church’ is probably the result of socialist education in schools.
Again the socialist preoccupation with undermining the family to get complete control. Dewey has had a profound and lamentable influence on U.S. schools.

Total Control: Socialism seems to attract control freaks and be inherently totalitarian. This is not often recognised because for some socialists it must be implemented gradually to avoid confrontation. Whether it’s the socialism of the U.S.S.R. or National Socialism (Nazism) or National Party Socialism in Apartheid South Africa or the African Socialism in President Nyerere’s Tanzania, they must control everybody. In the latter case, 11 million people were dumped out in the bush by forced removals so exceeding apartheid R.S.A in people moving. (16)

Rupture with the Past: Socialism seems to believe in a hermeneutic of discontinuity or rupture. De Tocqueville said that “democratic nations care little for what has been”. (17).
Socialists believe that history only began with the implementation of Socialism. John Dewey in his socialist education did not want any learning by rote or reference to the great educators of the past like Aquinas or Comenius as he believed that what was important was what was happening now.
The most extreme form of this socialist amnesia re the past and the need to start afresh was in socialist Cambodia under Pol Pot. He wanted the country to return to Year Zero and begin again. One of his many revolutionary slogans was “we will burn the old grass and the new will grow”. Even many Catholics caught up in the socialist ferment in Europe have also shown little regards for the past particularly after Vatican II. One prominent parish in London excoriated a Jesuit  Mission priest for preaching on the Rosary, the Sacred Heart of Jesus etc. as this was perceived by the Parish Council as ‘pre Vatican II”!

All Capitalists Now: Socialism seems to have relinquished one of its most important tenets: to destroy capitalism as all espouse this now bar one or two regimes. China has state capitalism. But socialism still remains devoted to destroying religion by stealth with its implementation of explicit sex education everywhere including South Africa where it was implemented in obscene haste.

Obscene Haste: Why the haste in implementing sex education everywhere? Perhaps because as education researcher Erica Carle points out ‘sex is the ultimate weapon in people taming and people control. When sex can be established in the mind... as the dominant idea... the mind can be incapacitated, the emotions destroyed, personal identity, family life and the maternal and paternal feelings are eroded. All else can be forgotten or regarded as unimportant, when the mind is captured by the dominant idea of sex”. (17A).
Dr James Parsons, a Florida psychologist says they are trying to create such an obsession with sex among our young people that they have not time or interest in spiritual pursuits”. (18). Dale O’Leary, the American author opines that the “sexual left” want sexual pleasure to be the highest good and so all that matters is sexual pleasure. Hence the need for divorce, abortion, contraception and condoms because these things are necessary for sexual pleasure”. (19).
Dostoevsky said that “if God does not exist everything is permitted”. If there is no God or afterlife we need to eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die. This may explain the gargantuan appetites of many of the top socialists like Karl Marx, Margaret Sanger,  Havlock Ellis, Bertrand Russell, Lavrenti Beria and Nicolai Yezhov (the most depraved monsters of Stalin’s court), Herbert Marcuse, Chairman Mao the ‘satyr, porn collector and sex maniac whose quarters swarmed with young women’ and who described himself us ‘without law and without heaven’, (20). Aldous Huxley said “we were opposed to morality because it interfered with our freedom” (21). The above libertarians would rejoice at the explicit Planned Parenthood textbooks used in U.S. and R.S.A. schools, where perversions like ‘autoerotic asphyxia’ are discussed freely (22). The P.P. textbooks introduced into South African from America are not there to stop children from sexual activity but to encourage children to become sexually active for tomorrow we die (23). An article in The Star 15/01/1997 entitled ‘Too sexy, too soon’ decries the sexualisation of children in R.S.A. Arnold Toynbee, one of the world’s greatest authorities on history and culture, has pointed out the importance of allowing children to imbibe a good all round education before the awakening of disorderly urges. For Socialist, the sooner, the better.

Margaret Sanger: These debased characters have had a profound influence on modern societies, universities, schools, parliaments and even religious textbooks used in Catholic schools. The Jewish  writer Elasah Drogin called the Fabian socialist Margaret Sanger the “Father of modern society” in a book by that name. (24). Sanger was also founder of Planned Parenthood (P.P.). The latter was spawned in America during the first 25 years of the 20th century by Sanger and her clique of devotees which included Fabian socialists, anarchists, Nazis, militant feminists, eugenicists, two husbands, sundry lovers and assorted ‘sycophants and gigolos’ as her son once called them. Her life was also a mess and she finished her life as a ravaged alcoholic demerol addict after blowing $5 million on a last fling before she died. (25).
Sanger believed that birth control would eliminate what she called ‘human weeds’ and ‘genetically inferior races’. Sanger’s Planned Parenthood praised the one child policy of China but believes in ‘more children from the fit and less from the unfit’. Tony Blair is a Fabian, ex Chairman in fact, and his wife Cherie a Planned Parenthood devotee and both are advocates of abortion. The fact that they have four children, not one, is probably due to the fact that they see themselves as belonging to the ‘more children from the fit’ category.
Sanger spoke of a project to hire 3 or 4 coloured ministers ‘with engaging personalities’ to travel through the black areas of the U.S.A. and propagandise for birth control. (26). Barack Obama has an engaging personality and seems to be doing this job with relish, if his track record on abortion and his espousing partial birth abortion and gay marriage, is anything to go by.
Sanger believed that the most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. She claimed that no one can doubt that abortion is justifiable. She aimed in her own words to exterminate the Negro (Black) population by birth control. (27). Strange that Obama a Black man should be such a big supporter of this racism and culture of death admired and implemented by Hitler an admirer of Sanger.
Nevertheless this Planned Parenthood racism and moral anarchy were introduced into all South African schools after 1994, so that Planned Parenthood could do as it wished with South African children. Lynette Burrows writing on Planned Parenthood’s global war on the family says that “we must have the most diseased generation of young people there has ever been”. (28).
This diseased generation is largely due I believe to socialist ideology. Socialists have been more ideological than pragmatic. Leon Trotsky admitted this before Stalin put an ice pick in his skull! Trotsky said: “Life proved more complicated than theory ever anticipated.

Outcomes Based Education: For example the Outcomes Based Education (O.B.E.) was introduced into R.S.A. by the new regime even though it was a disastrous failure everywhere and had to be removed at vast expanse. But it was politically correct, at least in socialist circles. Socialists of course have not much time for history, and “those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat its mistakes”. But ideology won through. Perhaps they believe with Abraham Lincoln that “the philosophy of the classroom in one generation will be the philosophy of the government in the next generation”.
In October 2008, the former University of Cape Town Vice Chancellor and World Bank Director Mamphela Rampele said that the education system in R.S.A. must be completely overhauled and the Outcomes Based Education done away with. “It has failed our nation”, she said urging a return to the four R’s : reading, writing, arithmetic and reasoning. She said: “We have chosen the worst curriculum policy that you could ever imagine … not a single country in this world that has undertaken O.B.E. has succeeded. Canada tried it, they dumped it. The U.K., the Netherlands and New Zealand tried it, they dumped it”.
Rampele said that the tragedy of the failure to correct the choice made in favour of O.B.E. was that the country was failing 80% of its poor young people”. (29). Education ideology like sex education ideology rules supreme even tho’ both were disastrous failures before implementation in R.S.A. No one is prepared to bite the bullet and remove it.
The education policy resulted in bans on school prayer assemblies and Bible reading even tho’ the majority of South Africans claim to be Christians. Abortion and gay marriage were introduced in spite of opposition from the majority of the people. Even the heir apparent to the Presidency Jacob Zuma had to retract a statement saying he could not stand gays. The ruling elite made sure of that.
If the democracy is “government of the people, by the people and for the people” (30) it does not seem to be happening in R.S.A. or the U.S.A. Secular humanists in America are only about 7.3 million – a small fraction of America’s population of 270 million, yet they have virtual control of the national media, book distribution, education and government. Whilst the vast majority of people in America believe in God, they are not allowed to say a prayer in school! The land of the free!

Democracy: Democracy seems to have a terrible weakness in allowing dedicated cliques to become an oligarchy as we now see happening in the European Union (E.U.). But then leading Socialists like Sanger detested the democratic process and her ideal form of government was one in which an elite ruled by an aristocratic form of government. (31).
According to an article in The Australian, “the leaders of the E.U. hate elections to the European parliament. Why? Because these caricatures of democratic decision-making expose the contempt with which the European public regards the oligarchy that runs the E.U.”. (32).
Oligarchy is the rule of the many by the few. The article goes on to say that there is a deliberate plan “to distance political decision-making from the gaze of European citizens” and to insulate the oligarchy from the kind of public pressure and forms of accountability that they experience in their national parliaments”.         
The newer states of Europe fought hard to get their autonomy and self-determination and now they surrender it all over to the faceless bureaucrats of Brussels!
It’s sad that America – at least Democratic Party America is buying into the whole European socialist agenda. Former Democratic Party Chairman H. Dean on December 8, 2009 said that cooperation between the European Socialists and the Democratic Party had intensified significantly. (33). The European culture of death cooperates with the U.S. culture of death! A Democratic Pro-Lifer is virtually an oxymoron!

Futurologists: In 1962 the socialist Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel seemed to have remarkable prescience. He was invited in 1962 to predict what the world would be like in 25 years time, and he stated that Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and Democratic regime and all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force and Jerusalem will become the scene of the Supreme Court of mankind. Seemingly the U.S.A. will become “a welfare state with a planned economy”. (33A). Perceptive writers and futurologists like de Tocqueville, Dostoevsky, George Orwell (1984) and Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) Ira Levin (This Perfect Day) all seem to be alarmed at what they perceive to be the path of democracies of the future – all seem to be socialist and totalitarian and when one looks at the way the European Union (E.U.) for instance, is being run, they were right to be alarmed. All the Soviet Socialist States were snooping, spying societies with pervasive government surveillance because in the absence of any system of inviolable, religiously based absolutes, anything goes which can lead to anarchy, so society must be policed by eternal surveillance reminiscent of the movie the “Trueman Show”. 
In the case of Aldous Huxley his prescience is probably less to do with prophetic gifts than with the fact that he lived cheek by jowl with the Fabian Socialists and probably heard them discuss regularly the Brave New World of social engineering in the future. One theory for Orwell’s Choice of 1984 was that it was the founding centenary of the totalitarian inclined Fabian Society (Wikipedia: 1984). Huxley’s brother Julian was like his father a great populariser of Darwin’s evolution, a materialistic world view where people are nothing more than ‘socially-constructed atomized robots which can presumably be deconstructed and melted into an atomized mass”.  (34). ‘They would have us believe that live matter evolved from inanimate matter, which is a kind of magic. That is a species of superstitious belief”. (35).
So Huxley mixing regularly with this culture of death crowd is probably only reporting in ‘Brave New World’ what he heard discussed by Fabian social engineers when they met regularly. e.g. “a world of absolute sexual license and absolute reproductive tyranny; a world where truth is a menace to universal peace and religion is pornography; a world where the word ‘mother’ is an obscenity and ‘father’ a scatological reference; a world where all that matters is one’s ‘comfort and happiness’ for which all must pay a small price, that of surrendering one’s humanity” (36) and freewill. And if people are only ‘atomised robots’ why not? This could explain the mega deaths under socialism in the U.S.S.R., China, Nazi Germany, North Korea where people were deconstructed as never before in history. The mega deaths by abortion continue apace in socialist countries.

Rebellion is a Sin or Sorcery” (1 Samuel 15:23): Not only were many socialists sexual antinomians but many seem to have dabbled regularly in the occult, so giving the lie that they only believed in a materialistic universe. Perhaps with the surrender of socialism’s preoccupation with the abolition of private property without hardly a murmur, it may be that socialism was really a monumental revolt and hatred for God posing as economic theory. Feodor Dostoevsky certainly thought so. Let’s look at the facts.

Karl Marx: Karl Marx’s earliest youthful poetry spews out venom and hatred of God. His father warned him of involvement with the demonic. His closest colleagues who called him ‘the Destroyer’ were nearly all dabblers in the occult e.g. Bakunin, Proudhon and Engels but the latter converted to Christianity before he died. Engels called Marx ‘a monster possessed by 10,000 devils’. Giuseppe Manzini, the Freemason associate of Marx said ‘he had a destructive spirit. His heart bursts with hatred rather than with love towards men’. The great historian Robert Payne said that Marx had ‘the devil’s malignity and knew he was accomplishing works of evil’. If, ‘by their fruits you will know them’, his were very bad indeed : he detested Jews and Blacks, half his children died of starvation and half of suicide. Like all occultists his family life was a mess and all his family seemed to have been involved in the God-hating, Satan-loving Theosophical Society. Marx’s daughter Tussy married a leading Theosophist. Marx when he read the Origin of the Species by Darwin exulted that God had been given “the death blow’. (37).

Besant and Sanger: Marx’s Theosophist son-in-law was a big friend of Annie Besant of the Fabians and an occultist. Annie Besant was a great rebel and birth control pioneer and became leader of the occult Theosophical Society. Margaret Sanger the most influential Fabian practiced Rosicrucian occultism and regularly attended séances. (38). Her family was also in a mess.
Two occultists who moved in Fabian circles were Alice Bailey and Marie Stopes (whose abortion clinics are all over R.S.A). Alice Bailey believed that Lucifer was the ‘Ruler of Humanity’ and she founded the Lucifer or Lucis Trust which sponsors World Goodwill, a political lobby group headquartered on the United Nations Plaza in New York. Bailey’s books give specific instructions for implementing ‘the Plan’ – a one world government and a one world Religion i.e. Theosophy. (38A).
At the core of this Planned New World Religion is the ‘Luciferic Consecration or Great Invocation. It was mass produced in small prayer card format in R.S.A. in 1988, adorned with Christian symbols and distributed to churches via Christian bookshops all over the country deceptively as a prayer for unity. There were a lot of red faces amongst Christians and their pastors who participated in this prayer service when it was later discovered to be of occult origin!
Marie Stopes was Britain’s answer to Margaret Sanger, and like Sanger she was a socialist and occultist. She insinuated herself into the Anglican Bishops’ Lambert Conference with ‘a message from God’ : that the bishops were to end their hostility to contraception which they did in 1930 and the rest of Protestantism followed like sheep even though it was against nearly 2000 years of what Christianity taught – including Luther and Calvin. Marie Stopes found Anglican bishops very pliable and hated Catholic bishops because they weren’t! (38B).
All who dabble in occultism seem to be anti life and culture of death, probably because their father Satan ‘was a liar and a murderer from the beginning’. (John 8:44).
As I have said Dostoevsky that great seer of totalitarianism, writing about the year 1877, believed that the 19th century would end for old Europe with something colossal, “so irresistible and terrifying that it would change the face of the earth, at any rate in Western Europe”. (39).
“Dostoevsky was totally hostile to this coming revolution because he believed that this movement for social reform was inspired and controlled by persons who were rebels against God and who, therefore far from leading humanity into the Promised Land would drag it into a state of slavery and oppression.
Dostoevsky discovered the deep-seated religious motive behind the coming rebellion; he defined it as a collective expression of refusal to play the game according to God’s rules which he so often described as the cause of the inner disintegration of an individual. His view was that instigators of the approaching revolution hated God and despised humanity, his creation; that they were convinced that they alone knew the truth, that the common man left to himself would act like a fool. Therefore, they were determined to use every form of compulsion and deceit in order to force people to take the road which would lead them to the earthly paradise of their own making. They asserted that, as God had failed to create a world satisfying to human beings, they had to rebuild it on a new plan, because they had the secret of universal happiness”. (40). Man made utopias have led to man made hells. (41).

Conclusion: Socialism, in spite of the above critique has achieved many good things like social welfare and a national health service as well as free education. But I believe that these would have been achieved anyway by the pre-Marxist social movements or Christian socialism (which helped form the first trade unions). I believe that the magnanimous call by Nelson Mandela for Reconciliation after 25 years in a South African prison owes nothing to his socialism and a lot to his Christian upbringing at home in Transkei.
Doctrinaire Marxism, both the revolutionary and evolutionary brands have been a disaster for the world. Under revolutionary Marxism more than a 100 million people have died. Under evolutionary or Fabian socialism millions of unborn children have been aborted, families have been destroyed, marriages broken by libertarian ideas. Marxist theory talked of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” but in reality it was the dictatorship of the oligarchy, the ‘new class’ (Djilas) or the ‘ruling class of managers’. (L. Plyusch).
The same thing is happening today under Fabian or Democratic socialism as we saw above in the takeover of the European Union by an oligarchy or in the U.S.A. ‘a sham democracy, a corporate-managerial state run by secularized elites contemptuous of middle America’. The more things change the more they remain the same!
“Russia will spread its errors throughout the world”. (Blessed Virgin Mary, Fatima, 1917).

Footnotes:
1.
Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 20, page 766
2.
Linda Kimball, Cultural Marxism. www Kimball is a syndicated international journalist
3.
Kimball
4.
P.J. Smith, Santorum, LifeSiteNews, 23/10/09
5.
Catholic World Report, (C.W.R.) June 2010, page 30
6.
Kimball
7.
Kimball
8.
Catholic Herald, Ed West, 16/04/2010
9.
Francis Fukuyama, in C.W.R., 1992, page 59
10.
H. Daniel-Rops, History, Volume 9, page 333
11.
Ed Koch, http:blog.archny.org
12.
Southern Cross, 20/02/2000
13.
Southern Cross, 06/10/2010
13A.
C. McCafferty & P. Hammond, The Pink Agenda, Christian Liberty Books, Cape Town, 2001, page 12,38,39
14.
L. Swords, Penance Homilies, page 35
15.
R.H. Goldsborough, Catholic Family News, 04/2000, page 5
16.
African Contemporary Record, Collins, 1977, B.351
17.
R. Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy, Chatto, 1957, page 161
17A.
J.M. Wallis, Chaos in the Classroom, page 219-220
18.
T. La Haye, Mind Siege, Word, Nashville, 2000, page 77
19.
Defending Marriage, L.H.L.A.; EWTN
20.
Time Magazine, 09/03/1992, page 54
21.
Crisis Magazine, 04/1993, page 11
22.
R. Engel, Sex Education, Tan, 1993, page 196. See also Finbarr Flanagan, Sex Education or Sex Perversion in South African Schools (www)
23.
T. La Haye, op.cit. page 77
24.
E. Drogin, CUL, New Hope, KY, 1985
25.
G. Bergel, Monstrosity of Planned Parenthood, Ugnayan, 11/1995
26.
E. Drogin, page 33
27.
E. Drogin, page 33
28.
Catholic Herald, (U.K.) 17/08/2001
29.
Living Newspaper Symposium, Cape Town, Independent on Line 28/10/2008
30.
Albert Nolan, Challenge, 02/1992
31.
E. Drogin, page 28
32.
theaustralian.com.au Seealso : www.lindsayjenkins.com 
33.
33A.
Look Magazine, 1962 (www)
34.
Linda Kimball, The Materialist Faith, www.americanthinker.com
35.
C.W.R. June 2010, page 31
36.
R. Engel, op.cit., page 209
37.
Richard Wurmbrand, Was Karl Marx a Satanist? M. Pickering, 1986
38.
E. Drogin, page 86
38A.
A.J. Benkovic, New Age Counterfeit, L.H.L.A. Clearwater, Florida, 1993, page 27
38B.
Irish Catholic 31/07/1997, page 13
39.
Sergius Wroblewski, The July Secret, Prow Books, 1985, page 42
40.
Sergius Wroblewski, page 41
41.
Thomas Molinar, Utopia, The Perennial Heresy, U.P.A., 1990